RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
Payoneer Completes Easylink Payment Acquisition, To Expand In China
Payoneer, a fintech company offering online money transfers and digital payment services, announced on 9 April 2024 tha... Read more
Adobe And Antom Partner To Enhance Digital Creativity Payments In Asia
Adobe and Antom, a provider of merchant payment and digitisation solutions under Ant International, announced a new col... Read more
HKMA Steps Up Against Digital Scams With Fresh Safeguards
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced “E-Banking Security ABC,” a series of new anti-digital fra... Read more
Staking-Enabled Bosera HashKey Ether ETF To Launch By End-April
Bosera International and HashKey Capital Limited announced the launch of the Bosera HashKey Virtual Asset Ether ETF on ... Read more
XTransfer Showcases Cross-Border Payment Solutions At AsiaWorld-Expo
XTransfer participated in the Global Sources Consumer Electronics Show 2025 at AsiaWorld-Expo on April 11, 2025, to pre... Read more
Bain Capital Aims To Raise US$9 Billion For New Asia Funds
Bain Capital is aiming to raise billions of US dollars for its upcoming Asia fund and a special situations fund in the... Read more