Top Counsels Clash On Jimmy Lai Bail Ruling

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2021-01-01 HKT 11:26

Share this story

facebook

  • Anita Yip said she doesn't understand why Jimmy Lai has to be remanded awaiting an appeal hearing over his earlier bail. Photo: RTHK

    Anita Yip said she doesn't understand why Jimmy Lai has to be remanded awaiting an appeal hearing over his earlier bail. Photo: RTHK

The vice chairwoman of the Bar Association, Anita Yip, has cast doubt on a decision by the top court to rescind bail for media tycoon Jimmy Lai, though executive councillor Ronny Tong said the bail threshold should be higher in national security cases.

Lai, who faces a charge under the national security law as well as a fraud case, was returned to jail on Thursday, just over a week after the High Court granted his release. He'll remain behind bars until the Court of Final Appeal can hold a full hearing on February 1.

Yip said she couldn't understand why the three-judge panel had decided Lai should be remanded until the hearing, which will consider whether a lower court judge erred in his interpretation of a provision of the security law limiting the right to bail.

The judges said that Lai should be remanded for now, as letting him go free would, in practice, mean accepting the lower court's decision to grant bail. But Yip disagreed, saying all appeals are in essence a challenge to a lower court's decision.

Speaking on a RTHK radio programme, the senior counsel said that the court should have also considered other factors, such as whether the accused would abscond and the strength of the prosecution evidence.

But Tong, who is also a senior counsel, said the national security law stipulated a higher threshold than in other cases for suspects who want to seek bail while awaiting trial.

He said it is up to the defense to convince the court that the accused would not violate the security law again while being released.

The top court will determine in the next hearing whether the High Court judge properly applied Article 42 of the national security law. The article says suspects must be held in custody unless a judge is satisfied that they no longer threaten national security.

Lai's bail conditions included a stipulation that he remain at home except when reporting to police or attending court. He was also required to put up a HK$10 million bond and was banned from giving interviews, contacting foreign officials or posting on social media.

RECENT NEWS

Tencent Officially Launches T1 Reasoning Model In Chinas Competitive AI Landscape

Tencent has officially unveiled its T1 reasoning model, marking a significant step forward in the increasingly competit... Read more

Ping An Insurance Achieves A 47.8% Rise In 2024 Net Profit

Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (Ping An) announced on 19 March 2025 its financial results for the yea... Read more

HashKey Capital Secures Type 1 Licence From SFC, Grows Crypto Services In HK

On 18 March 2025, HashKey Capital received a Type 1 licence from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC),... Read more

Ping An P&C And FAW Hongqi Launch Hongqi Intelligent Driving Protection Services

Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company of China (Ping An P&C), a subsidiary of Ping An Insurance, has pa... Read more

HKSTP European Innovation Mixer Tour Nurtures Global Ties For Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HKSTP), led by CEO Albert Wong, conducted the HKSTP European In... Read more

The Full List Of Fintech Unicorns In Hong Kong (2025)

Hong Kong’s fintech landscape has evolved into a dynamic force in Asia, driven by regulatory innovation, technologica... Read more